Collision Repair Shop Cycle Time Bandits

Cycle Time Bandits

Where are the cycle time bandits in your business?  This key question becomes the starting point for streamlining your business and increasing profits.

Before you can accurately locate these profit stealing activities in your shop, you must first understand what you are measuring.  Here is a key point.  There are two timelines that we concern ourselves with.  One is the time we spend working on the vehicle, which is labor time, not cycle time. The other timeline is how long a vehicle resides in your care before being returned to the customer.  This is the timeline that is important, because it is the cycle time of the repair.  It is the time the vehicle spends doing something, or waiting on something, that is important.

For example, if you have to spend an extra 30 minutes of time on a vehicle that saves a day of vehicle cycle time, it is the day of cycle time savings that is important.  The 30 minutes can be billed as labor, but does not contribute to the vehicles cycle time.

In the language of Lean, we call this the value stream.  The value stream is made up of value added and non-value added steps.  Basically, value added steps are those things the customer doesn’t mind paying for; non-value added steps are those things that they do not want to pay for.  For example, the insurance company would be happy to pay a half hour of labor that cuts a day of cycle time from the repair.  They are not happy about paying for the rental car charges for an extra day while the vehicle waits for some sort of service.

One last note; when considering cycle time, a return of the vehicle to the shop due to some repair problem, adds to cycle time. Everybody loses in this situation.  You need to evaluate every comeback and eliminate its root cause.

Heatcraft Tifton Georgia

Thanks to the folks at Heatcraft in Tifton, Georgia, for spending some time with me. They have a design/build to customer specification manufacturing process that operates at a very good cycle time. This takes a “can do” attitude, and they have it.

They will tell you that focusing on the customer makes all the difference and they are right. That’s how you keep/save jobs.

An email to my staff about alignment

This email is not addressing a current problem.  I simply want to make sure everyone understands the importance of working through your teammates and not around them. As we grow and become a more diverse and complex group of employees, one of the first things that will be compromised is alignment of agenda and purpose. Customers and prospects should get the same message and content every time they communicate with us.  This means all of us must be “singing from the same piece of music”. We are all aware of how inconsistency has hurt us in the past.  Just imagine how bad it could have been with 10 or more times as many customers and prospects. Remember that none of us alone know everything we  need to know to plot a course for our future. As a team though, we come pretty close.

 

In order to make sure customers and prospects receive the same message, no matter who they communicate with, our message content must be standardized. This means that we will only use approved sales and marketing material. “Approved” means that the team has signed off on the content and message. This is not meant to stifle creativity, just to protect the integrity of the message.

 

It is important that we keep the approved sales and marketing documents on the Google Drive and shared folder (I will get this folder set up) so that we all have access to them.  All communication with customers and prospects must be consistent with approved  content and message.  When creating a new document (word, ppt, etc.), or proposing a change to CDS’s messaging, the approval process involves the sign off of the other team members. We do pretty good at this, I believe.  It only works, though, when we actually read the proposed new or modified documents and give feedback to insure their alignment with currently approved content. I will not approve anything where I haven’t seen feedback from other team members.

 

When a current approved document or message needs updating, it must go through the approval process.  There should be no “draft” or unapproved documents on the Google Drive or in the shared folder. There should be no communication with customers and prospects that includes information out of alignment with approved content. In other words, no freelancing or operating on your own agenda. This includes email and phone conversations with customers and prospects. These may not go through the approval process, but the onus is on you to insure that content is consistent with the agreed upon CDS message.

 

Sales and Marketing 101: Prospects and customers like consistency of message because they can predict how outcomes can affect their business. Inconsistency will make us seem unreliable and drive profits out of the business.

Walter McIntyre Article in Metaops Magazine

MetaOps Magazine presents “Keeping the Main Thing the Main Thing”

By Walter McIntyre

LIVONIA, March 1, 2014 – There are so many issues corporate leaders face each day. The question is how to prioritize them? In his article, the author discusses his 5S method to help decision makers keep their eye on the ball and focus on what needs to be done.

http://metaopsmagazine.com/keeping-the-main-thing-the-main-thing/

Walter McIntyre has spent 30 years in the business world, holding positions from apprentice to Vice PresidentHe is currently the Chief Operations Officer and General Manager of Nationwide Parts Distributors and Automotive Electronic Solutions Technologies in Jacksonville, Florida.

About MetaOps, Inc.
MetaOps, Inc. helps companies increase their market share and profit through PeopleCentrix™ approach. The company’s team of world-class experts brings an extensive toolkit that helps management see problems and opportunities while teaching staff how to make dramatic improvements and drive sustainable improvement. Learn how to transform your own organization, boosting efficiency, and increasing market share, by visiting MetaOps on the web.

Reality

One of the most important responsibilities of a leader is to define reality for those they lead.  It is also a significant failure point for leaders.  From a simplistic point of view, there are three realities that we typically deal with.

As we think it is universe: This universe is defined by our opinions and prejudices. It is not basedin reality. An expression of this is when we think for the customer instead of consulting with them. These can be internal or external customers. These leaders will be described as poor listeners or defensive. It takes very little time for leaders using this universe as a model to lose the confidence of their followers and be left with nothing but position power. Self-limiting decisions or failure to achieve the best results are the result.

As we want it to be universe: This is the denial universe.  It, just like the as we think it is universe, is not based in reality. These leaders will be seen as naïve or in denial of the facts and have no credibility with others. They still have their position power, but that will not be enough.  Failure will be the result.

As is universe: This universe finds its basis in the current reality.  It takes discipline to gather the information that defines this reality, but the results are well worth the effort.  These leaders have the confidence of others.  A trait of these leaders is that they listen more than they speak.  Another is that when they do speak, the listeners see alignment in what they say with their own personal experiences. The result is synergy with others and the best chance of success.

Analogy: If you are working in a sewer, and a person in leadership says “It doesn’t smell in here”, the leader has no credibility.  If you are working in a sewer, and a person in leadership says “It smells in here, but we are going to have to deal with it”, that leader has credibility.

Who do want to work for?  Which leader do you want to be?

The Leadership Riddle

As a leader I find my fulfillment within the success my subordinates’ experience while executing the strategies and plans that we have put in place. This amounts to me experiencing success in the third dimension by watching others succeed.

I first learned this as a basketball coach, watching my kids on the court successfully execute strategy we had worked on in practice. That was the expression of my success. The more they were recognized the more successful I felt and the more successful I really was.

This is an important lesson in leadership for anyone who wants to be in a position of leading others, either on the field of play or in the boardroom. As I have said many times before, you cannot be a leader if no one is willing to follow you, and no one will be willing to follow you if they don’t trust you. This means that leadership is really about service and about facilitating. It is about allowing the success of others on your team to lift you to greater heights of achievement.

The question becomes this. What is in the wake of your life. Is it broken promises, people who don’t trust you, people who don’t like you, people for whom your presence in their life has been a negative. Or is it kept promises, is it people whose lives have been enriched and lifted up because of your presence in their life.

This really becomes the definition of leadership from the third person perspective. Consider an individual who is looking back at your life objectively, without political spin. It’s not a question of “What’s in your wallet?” as the commercial asks. It is instead a question of “what’s in your life” and the impact of what’s in your life on others.

In other words don’t measure your success as a leader from your own perspective. That will always be biased. Measure instead from the third party perspective, which represents how others feel about you and your leadership role

Sent from my iPhone

Leadership and Followship

Some us work for external customers, some for internal customers, and some for both.  It is easy to fail to deliver on the needs of internal customers because we fail to see them as customers.

All of us need to ask ourselves if our internal customers are happy with our service delivery.  To your customers, it doesn’t matter why there is a problem, only that there is a problem.

I’ll leave you with this: Leadership cannot exist without followship.  This relationship springs out of the fact that successful leaders are servants and facilitators for their customers (both internal and external).  Are you doing all the things necessary to build followship of your leadership?

Editing Your Silo

“Editing your silo” is about gravitating to your own belief system compatible information, instead of challenging your believe system. Stated another way, it is tuning your thoughts and words to arguing your perspective as opposed to drilling down to why you, and others, believe what they believe. Are you editing your silo? If you focus more on the minutia of the social strata of who and why someone has a particular perspective, instead of trying to understand the perspective itself, you are probably editing your silo. “All my friends believe this”, “I am only friends with others who believe like me”, or “I believe this, therefore I am right”.

Doubt is the driving force of both innovation and faith. The innovative process, like faith in your belief system, is strengthened through challenges. Just like exercise develops your body’s strength and stamina, allowing for doubt and belief system challenges develops the quality of your ideas and the depth of your faith.

Sync’ing is a way to exit “editing your silo” thinking. Sync’ing is about listening to and seeking to understand others first, then trying to be understood yourself second (Stephen Covey). Sync’ing your knowledge, information and perceptions with others brings alignment by way of shrinking the differences between people’s perspectives. There will always be differing perspectives between people, but understanding will allow appreciation of the differences instead of fearing the differences.

One of the main reasons behind the failure to bring a good idea from concept to profit production is silo editing. Innovators that fail to get out of their self made box (fail to sync with others) also typically fail to obtain, or use, the contextual information that will convert facts to truth. This manifests itself as thinking for the customer, prospect or teammate instead of sync’ing with their perspectives. Two heads are better than one only if they are synced and working together. The result is often a hybrid idea or perspective that employees the best of the various view points. This is the back bone of consultative sales. It is also the back bone of innovative idea generation and innovative engineering.